Free Case Evaluation
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW
Hurt on a Temp Assignment in Houston? Two Companies Owe You Answers
A temp worker hurt on assignment has a problem no direct hire faces, two companies each pointing at the other.
The staffing agency signed your paycheck. The client company ran the site, gave the orders, and controlled the machine that hurt you.
Which one answers for your injury, and in which legal system, depends on facts you can check: whose comp coverage existed, and who directed the details of your work.
Houston runs on assigned labor: warehouses, plants, construction crews, and packaging lines staffed through agencies.
The paperwork in these cases is written to close doors that Texas law leaves open.
Call (888) 713-6653 for a free, confidential review of your Houston temp or staffing agency injury claim.
At-a-Glance: Texas Temp Worker Injury Claims
- A staffing agency's workers' comp certificate can cover both the agency and its client under Labor Code Chapter 93
- A client company claiming that shield must prove it was actually covered, and that you were actually assigned to it
- When either company opted out of comp, it can be sued for negligence with its main defenses stripped
- Who directed the details of your work decides who counts as your employer under Texas's borrowed-servant rules
- Other companies on the site stay suable third parties regardless of the employment fight
- Temp workers are hurt disproportionately in their first days, and the training records usually show why
How Texas Decides Which of Your Two Employers Answers for an Injury
Texas law starts from control. The company that had the right to direct the details of your work, rather than only its result, is your employer for injury purposes, whatever the payroll paperwork says. On a temp assignment that is usually the client: its supervisors set your tasks, its equipment surrounds you, and its schedule runs your day. Courts call this the borrowed-servant doctrine, and the Texas Supreme Court has applied it to hold client companies to be temp workers' employers based on exactly those facts.[1]
Being your employer cuts both ways. An employer covered by workers' compensation is generally immune from suit and owes comp benefits instead. An employer without coverage is a Texas non-subscriber, suable for negligence and stripped of its best defenses. So the two-company fight in a temp case is really a fight over two questions: who employed you, and was that company actually covered.
The answers route the whole case, which is why they are the first thing we establish, from the staffing contract, the certificate of coverage, and the testimony about who actually gave the orders.
The Comp Certificate, and When the Client Company Keeps Its Shield
Chapter 93 of the Labor Code governs staffing arrangements directly. When a temporary employment service carries workers' compensation, its certificate of coverage counts as proof of coverage for both the service and its client, for the employees assigned to that client.[2] When that machinery works, comp is the exclusive remedy against both companies, and the injured worker's case moves to the third parties on the site.
The machinery does not always work, and the Texas Supreme Court made the client's burden real in Garza v. Exel Logistics, 161 S.W.3d 473 (Tex. 2005): a client company claiming the comp shield must actually establish that it was covered. Coverage lapses. Contracts go unsigned. Workers get lent sideways to affiliates and other sites the agreement never covered. A worker hurt outside the scope of the actual assignment is outside the shield.
None of this is visible from where an injured temp sits, which is the point. The client company will assert the shield whether or not the paperwork supports it, and testing the assertion is legal work that changes the value of the case by multiples.
When a Texas Client Company Can Be Sued Anyway
Several doors stay open even when the staffing relationship is genuine.
No Coverage in Fact
If the agency's policy had lapsed, excluded the client, or never existed, the client has no shield to claim, and if the client relied on its own coverage, that coverage has to have actually reached you. A company that cannot prove coverage is, as to you, a non-subscriber.
You Were Not Assigned to That Company
The Chapter 93 shield covers employees assigned to the client under the staffing agreement. A worker sent to a different site, a different affiliate, or a different kind of work than the agreement covered can fall outside it.
Either Company Opted Out
A non-subscriber agency or client faces a straight negligence suit, and under Texas law it cannot blame your carelessness or a co-worker's. Staffing arrangements in warehouse and light-industrial Houston include non-subscribers more often than people assume, and the answer is verifiable.
The Site's Other Companies
The contractor whose forklift hit you, the maintenance company that skipped the guard, the manufacturer of the machine: all third parties, all suable in full, whatever happens in the employment fight. Sorting the whole map is what our page on who you can sue for a Houston work injury is for.
Why Houston Temp Workers Get Hurt More, and Where the Proof Lives
Assigned workers are injured out of proportion to their numbers, and the pattern repeats so reliably that federal OSHA has run a temporary-worker initiative on it for years. The reasons are documented in the records of every case we work.
- The first-week assignment. Temps disproportionately get hurt in their first days on a site, before anyone has shown them the hazards the regulars learned to avoid.
- The training gap. The agency assumes the client trains; the client assumes the agency did. Both duties are real, and the sign-in sheets and training logs show whether either was honored.
- The worst tasks. Assigned labor draws the jobs the permanent workforce avoids: the manual handling, the cleanup around running machines, the dock work at pace.
- The pressure not to report. A temp who reports a hazard or an injury fears the assignment simply ending. That fear shows up later as a defense argument, and we answer it with the records of what the companies knew.
Every one of those failures belongs to a company with a duty, an insurer, and a file. The case is built from that file.
What a Houston Temp Worker Injury Claim Is Worth
The routing decides the ceiling. A pure comp case pays scheduled benefits: a portion of wages and medical care, nothing for pain, and nothing for the full loss of a working future. A negligence case against a non-subscriber employer or a third party is uncapped: full medical care past and future, full lost earning capacity, and the human damages comp never touches.
That gap is why the paperwork arrives so fast after a temp worker gets hurt: benefit enrollments, arbitration agreements, and releases pushed while the worker is still in pain and worried about the next assignment. Sign nothing before a lawyer reads it. The claims this page describes can be traded away in one signature, for a fraction of their value.
The consultation is free, in English or Spanish, and if the honest answer is that your comp claim is on track and needs no lawyer, that is the answer you will get. One more thing the paperwork pushers rely on: fear about immigration status. It changes none of these rights, as our page on undocumented worker injury rights in Texas explains.