Free Case Evaluation
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW
Window Washer and Suspended Scaffold Fall Lawyers
A swing stage that drops on one end, a bosun chair that fails, an anchor that pulls out of a parapet. In New York these are absolute liability cases.
Labor Law 240(1) covers cleaning of a building, and the Court of Appeals has placed commercial window washing squarely inside that protection.
So a window cleaner who falls from a suspended scaffold has the same claim as an ironworker who falls from steel, against the building owner and the contractor, no matter how careful or careless anyone was.
New York adds a second statute. Labor Law 202 obligates building owners and managers to provide safe means for cleaning windows and exterior surfaces.
Two statutes, one accident, and neither of them asks whether you made a mistake.
Call (888) 713-6653 for a free review of your facade or window cleaning fall claim. You Win or It's Free.
- Commercial window washing is covered cleaning under Labor Law 240(1)
- Labor Law 202 puts a separate duty on the building owner and manager
- Free Legal Evaluation - You Pay Nothing Unless We Win
Why a Window Cleaner's Fall Is a Scaffold Law Case
Labor Law 240(1) lists the covered activities by name: erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning, or pointing of a building or structure.[1] Cleaning is in the statute, and it has been since long before anyone called it the Scaffold Law.
The limit on that word was set in Soto v. J. Crew Inc., 21 N.Y.3d 562 (2013), where a worker fell from a ladder while dusting a store display. The Court held routine commercial janitorial work is not covered cleaning, using a four-factor analysis that asks whether the task is routine and recurring, whether it requires specialized equipment or expertise, whether the elevation risk resembles ordinary household cleaning, and whether it relates to any construction or repair project.[2]
The Court framed that test as applying outside the sphere of commercial window washing. Facade and window cleaning on a New York building sits inside the statute's protection, and it is not hard to see why: the work requires specialized rigging and training, and the elevation risk has nothing in common with wiping a household window.
"There is no version of hanging forty stories over Sixth Avenue that resembles ordinary housekeeping, and the statute has never pretended otherwise."
What absolute liability means in practice: if the suspended scaffold, the rigging, the anchors, or the fall arrest system failed to give proper protection, the owner and the contractor are liable. Your own carelessness does not reduce the claim, and neither does an employer's negligence, because the duty cannot be delegated. The framework is covered on our page about the Labor Law 240 Scaffold Law.
Labor Law 202: The Building Owner's Separate Duty
New York has a statute written specifically for this work. Labor Law 202 requires the owner, lessee, agent, and manager of every public building, and every contractor involved, to provide safe means for cleaning the windows and exterior surfaces of the building as required and approved by the board of standards and appeals. It also requires employers and contractors to comply with the board's rules and to require employees to use the equipment and safety devices those rules mandate.[3]
The state's window cleaning regulations at 12 NYCRR Part 21 fill in the detail: structural requirements for anchors and safety devices on the building itself, equipment specifications, and required procedures.
This matters because it reaches the building owner directly, on a duty tied to the building's own permanent safety equipment. Anchors, davits, tie-back points, and roof rigging are the building's, not the cleaning contractor's, and when one of them fails the responsibility sits with whoever owns and maintains it.
How These Falls Actually Happen
Suspended scaffold accidents are equipment failures far more often than they are worker errors, and the failure is usually traceable to a specific piece of hardware someone was responsible for.
A swing stage that drops at one end throws the platform vertical, and everything on it goes with it.
The recurring mechanisms: a hoist or motor failure on one side, a wire rope that frays or is not properly seated, a counterweight or outrigger rigged wrong on the roof, an anchor or tie-back that pulls out of deteriorated masonry, a parapet that gives way, a missing or improperly rigged independent lifeline, a bosun chair or boatswain's rigging failure, and a worker who was never given a compliant harness or had nothing to tie off to that was independent of the platform.
The independent lifeline is the detail that decides survival. Fall protection tied to the same structure holding the platform fails when the platform fails, and that combination turns a rigging problem into a fatality.
Facade Work, Local Law 11, and the Sheds That Never Come Down
New York City's Facade Inspection Safety Program, still known to everyone as Local Law 11, requires periodic exterior inspections for buildings taller than six stories, on a five-year cycle. Cycle 10 began on February 21, 2025 and runs through February 21, 2030.[4]
That program is why so much of the city is permanently wrapped in sidewalk sheds and hung with suspended scaffolds. It keeps masonry from falling on pedestrians, and it puts a continuous population of workers over the street on swing stages and bosun chairs.
Facade repair work is unambiguously covered by Labor Law 240 and 241(6), because it is repair and alteration rather than cleaning, which removes the Soto question entirely and brings the Industrial Code into the case as well. Where a case involves both cleaning and repair scopes, we plead both.
The same rigging that endangers workers endangers people below, and pedestrians struck by falling material or by a shed or scaffold failure have their own claims. That overlap is discussed in our coverage of falling object claims under Labor Law 240.
The Injuries These Cases Involve
A fall from a suspended scaffold is measured in stories, so the injury profile is severe even when the worker survives.
- Fatal falls, giving rise to wrongful death and survival claims by the estate
- Spinal cord injury and paralysis from axial loading and vertebral fracture
- Traumatic brain injury, including cases where a helmet was worn and the injury still occurred
- Complex pelvic and lower extremity fractures requiring multiple surgeries and hardware
- Internal organ damage and crush injuries
- Suspension trauma from prolonged hanging in a harness after an arrested fall
- Amputations from hoist and rigging entanglement
- Post-traumatic stress, which in this trade frequently ends the career even where the physical injury heals
Catastrophic outcomes need a documented future, not an estimate. That work is described on our page about life care planning in catastrophic cases.
What a Suspended Scaffold Fall Claim Can Recover
The Labor Law case recovers what workers' compensation does not, and New York places no cap on compensatory damages.
Because liability under 240(1) does not turn on fault, these cases move to the damages question faster than most, which puts the weight on how completely the future is proven.
- Past and future medical care, including surgeries, rehabilitation, and revision procedures
- Lifetime attendant care, home modification, and adaptive equipment
- Full lost earnings rather than the capped comp benefit
- Lost future earning capacity in a trade with a specific and provable wage
- Pain and suffering, past and future
- Disfigurement and scarring
- Loss of enjoyment of life
- Loss of consortium for a spouse
- Wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering where a worker was killed
Commercial buildings in Manhattan carry substantial insurance, which matters in a catastrophic case where a single primary policy would not cover a life care plan. New York's no-cap rule is explained on our page about the one damages cap New York added in 2026.
Who Is on the Hook Besides Your Employer
The window cleaning or restoration contractor that employs you is behind the workers' compensation bar. Everyone else is available.
The building owner is liable under Labor Law 240 and under Labor Law 202. The managing agent and net lessee can be liable as owners or as the parties who contracted for the work. On a facade project the general contractor and any construction manager with safety authority are defendants. The rigging contractor that set the outriggers and counterweights is exposed for its own work.
Then there is the equipment. The manufacturer and the lessor of the suspended scaffold, the hoists, the wire rope, the harness, and the anchors face product liability claims when a component fails, and those claims live or die on preserving the hardware. Who else lands on the defendant list is covered on our page about owner, GC, and construction manager liability.
Why This Firm for a Facade or Window Cleaning Fall
These cases are won on the rigging. The hoists, the wire rope, the anchors, the counterweights, and the harness need to be preserved and examined by an engineer before anyone repairs, replaces, or quietly discards them, and that demand has to go out in days rather than months.
Our firm has handled more than 40,000 injury cases and recovered over $100 million, with a 98 percent recovery rate. Our attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, and the National Trial Lawyers, and we work New York Labor Law cases from an office at 305 Broadway in Lower Manhattan.
What we bring to a case like this is the willingness to try it. Building owners and their carriers pay attention to which firms file cases and which firms take them to verdict, and on an absolute liability claim that difference tends to show up directly in the offer.
The consultation is free, the fee is contingent, and we will come to the hospital or your home if you cannot travel to us.