Free Case Evaluation
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW
Who Is Liable for an Arc Flash Burn on a New York Job Site?
The property owner and the general contractor, plus whoever was supposed to confirm the circuit was dead.
An arc flash is not electrocution. Current never has to pass through the body. An arcing fault vaporizes copper and superheats the surrounding air, and the injury comes from radiant heat, molten metal, and a pressure wave.
That distinction matters legally, because it changes which safety failure caused the harm and which rules were broken.
New York's Industrial Code is unusually specific here. It says power lines are to be treated as energized until somebody gives assurance otherwise, and it requires employers to determine voltages and investigate before the work starts.
Those are checkable commands, not general advice, which is what makes them useful.
Call (888) 713-6653 for a free review of your electrical injury claim. No fee unless we win.
Arc Flash Injury Claims at a Glance
- Industrial Code 23-1.13 governs electrical hazards in construction and demolition
- All power lines near a site must be treated as energized until assurance is given
- Employers must determine voltage levels and investigate contact risk before work begins
- Written notice to the utility is required five working days before work within 10 feet of a live line
- No bare current-carrying parts within eight feet above where people work or pass
- Arc flash burns thermally; electrocution passes current through the body; different proof
- Equipment manufacturers and maintenance contractors are frequently additional defendants
Arc Flash Versus Electrocution, and Why the Difference Changes the Case
These get treated as the same injury, and they are not.
In an electrocution, current passes through the body along a path from contact point to ground. The damage is internal and follows that path: cardiac arrhythmia, deep tissue destruction between entry and exit, and neurological injury.
In an arc flash, a fault jumps across an air gap between conductors. The arc itself can reach temperatures several times hotter than the surface of the sun, vaporizing copper and aluminum into an expanding cloud of superheated gas and molten metal. The worker can be badly burned without ever touching anything energized. The accompanying pressure wave, the arc blast, throws people across rooms, ruptures eardrums, and drives shrapnel from the failing equipment.
The practical consequences for a claim:
- Distance is not a defense. A worker standing several feet from a panel can sustain third-degree burns. The defense argument that he was never in contact with anything misunderstands the mechanism.
- Clothing becomes part of the injury. Non-rated synthetic clothing ignites and continues burning after the arc is over, which is precisely why arc-rated garments exist and why their absence is a live issue.
- The equipment is the evidence. The failed gear itself records what happened, and it can be quarantined, replaced, or scrapped within days.
- Product claims frequently attach. A panel or breaker that failed to clear a fault in the time it was designed to may support a claim against its manufacturer alongside the Labor Law claims.
Where current did travel through the body, our page on construction electrocution accidents covers that mechanism and its distinct medical profile.
What Industrial Code § 23-1.13 Requires Before Anyone Opens a Panel
Labor Law § 241(6) makes owners and contractors answerable for violations of Industrial Code provisions that set concrete specifications, and 23-1.13 is full of them.[1]
| Provision | What It Requires | The Question It Answers |
|---|---|---|
| 23-1.13(b)(1) | All power lines and facilities near the site are considered energized until assurance is given otherwise | Who gave the assurance, and on what basis |
| 23-1.13(b)(2) | The employer must determine voltage levels of energized lines and facilities before work begins | Was the voltage actually determined, or assumed |
| 23-1.13(b)(3) | Ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or instruments whether the work may bring a person into contact with a circuit | Was anything metered before the work started |
| 23-1.13(b)(4) | No worker permitted near a circuit he may contact unless it is de-energized and grounded, or guarded by effective insulation | Was the circuit locked out and grounded |
| 23-1.13(b)(5) | Open switches guarded against inadvertent closing while workers remain exposed | Who re-energized it, and how was that possible |
| 23-1.13(b)(6) | Written notice to the utility at least five normal working days before work within 10 feet of a live overhead line | Was the notice sent, and does it exist |
| 23-1.13(b)(8) | Wiring with cracked or deteriorated insulation removed from service immediately and discarded | Was defective cable known and left in use |
| 23-1.13(c)(1) | No bare or unprotected current-carrying parts within eight feet above where people work or pass, unless fully guarded | Was temporary power run legally |
Read down that right-hand column. Every one of those questions has a documentary answer that exists somewhere outside the memory of the crew: a lockout tag log, a utility notification letter, a meter reading recorded on a permit, a daily report, or a purchase order for temporary power. Cases in this category are built from that paper.
Whether a provision is specific enough to support a § 241(6) claim is its own threshold question, and the answer turns on the exact subdivision relied upon. Our page on Labor Law § 241(6) and Industrial Code violations covers how New York courts apply that test.
The Five-Day Utility Notice Nobody Thinks to Ask For
Subdivision (b)(6) requires an employer to give written notice to the utility at least five normal working days before beginning work within ten feet of any live overhead power line.
That is an unusually useful requirement for an injured worker, for three reasons.
It is written, so it either exists or it does not, and its absence is not something a witness can explain away. It is dated, so it establishes what was known five days before anyone climbed anything. And it is directed at a third party with no stake in the litigation, meaning the utility's own file becomes a source of evidence outside the contractor's control.
The same subdivision structure runs through the high-voltage provisions for circuits over 300 volts to ground, which require written notification to the owners of those lines and the receipt of recommended safety procedures before work proceeds nearby. On a contact case involving a boom, a lift, or a crane near overhead lines, the first request we make is for those notifications and the responses to them.
How Arc Flash Injuries Happen on Construction and Renovation Work
Arc flash events cluster around energized work that was supposed to be de-energized, and around equipment that failed while being operated normally.
Work on Equipment Wrongly Believed to Be Dead
The single most common pattern. Somebody opened the wrong breaker, a panel was mislabeled, a feed came from a second source, or the lockout was removed by another crew. The code answers this directly by requiring circuits to be treated as energized until assurance is given.
Racking Breakers and Switching Operations
Inserting or withdrawing a breaker under load, or operating a switch on equipment with an existing fault, puts a worker directly in front of the arc path at the moment it forms.
Dropped Tools and Conductive Contact
A wrench, a fish tape, a piece of conduit, or a ladder bridging phases inside an open enclosure. The worker who dropped it is frequently not the one most badly burned.
Deteriorated and Contaminated Equipment
Moisture, dust, corrosion, and rodent damage inside gear that has not been maintained, particularly in older New York buildings and in flooded basements and vaults. Maintenance records are the evidence and the maintenance contractor is frequently a defendant.
Contact With Overhead Lines
Booms, lifts, cranes, scaffolds, and ladders brought within striking distance of energized lines. This is where the notification and clearance provisions do the most work.
Temporary Power on Active Sites
Site-built distribution, damaged cord sets, missing ground-fault protection, and unguarded current-carrying parts strung where crews walk. The eight-foot rule in subdivision (c) exists for exactly this.
The Injuries an Arc Flash Produces
This is a multi-system trauma that gets undervalued when it is described as a burn and left there.
- Deep partial and full thickness burns. To the face, hands, forearms, and torso, requiring staged excision, grafting, and reconstruction over years.
- Inhalation injury. From superheated air and vaporized metal, with airway consequences that can be more dangerous than the surface burns.
- Blast trauma. Ruptured tympanic membranes and permanent hearing loss, plus fractures and head injury from being thrown.
- Eye injury. Corneal burns and retinal damage from the intensity of the flash, sometimes with lasting visual impairment.
- Traumatic brain injury. From the pressure wave and from impact after being thrown, and frequently overlooked while the burns are being treated.
- Permanent scarring and contracture. Functional loss where scarring crosses joints, and disfigurement that is separately compensable in New York.
- Post-traumatic stress and chronic pain. Common, well documented in burn survivors, and a real component of these claims rather than an add-on.
Burn injuries also carry a distinctive damages profile, because the treatment continues for years and the disfigurement is permanent and visible. Our page on severe burn injury claims covers how those damages are established.
What an Arc Flash Claim Can Recover in New York
New York places no cap on compensatory damages, and in a serious burn case the difference between a capped state and an uncapped one is substantial.
- Past and future medical expenses. Burn center admission, staged surgeries, grafting, scar revision, hearing and vision treatment, and projected future reconstruction.
- Lost earnings and lost earning capacity. Including benefit and pension contributions for electricians and other union trades.
- Pain and suffering. Ordinarily the largest component. Burn treatment is prolonged and painful, and that is properly reflected in the valuation.
- Disfigurement. A recognized element in New York, and significant where scarring is to the face, neck, and hands.
- Loss of enjoyment of life. Separately compensable.
- Future care and household services. Priced by a life care planner where the injury is permanent.
- Loss of consortium. A spouse's independent claim.
- Wrongful death and survival damages. Where the worker did not survive, the estate can pursue his conscious pain and suffering separately from the family's pecuniary loss.
Workers' compensation runs alongside the third-party claims rather than replacing them, and the carrier's lien on any recovery is negotiable. Our page on the Labor Law claim alongside workers' compensation explains the interaction.
Why Injured Electricians Bring Arc Flash Cases to Lawsuit Legal
The equipment that failed is the best evidence in the case, and it is usually replaced within days because the building needs power back.
- A New York attorney and a New York office. Don Worley has been admitted in New York since 2005, with more than 20 years in personal injury practice. The firm's office at 305 Broadway sits in the Manhattan courthouse district.
- Verified Scaffold Law experience. New York Labor Law § 240 and § 241 claims are a core part of the practice.
- Preservation demands go out immediately. The failed gear, the protective equipment worn, and the clothing, before any of it is discarded.
- The paper trail requested early. Lockout logs, utility notifications, voltage determinations, maintenance records, and arc flash hazard analyses.
- Product claims evaluated alongside the Labor Law claims. Gear that failed to clear a fault as designed is a separate case against a separate defendant.
- Recognized trial lawyers. Our attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers, the Million Dollar Advocates Forum, and the National Trial Lawyers.
- A record built across 40,000 cases. Over $100 million recovered, a 98% recovery rate, and no fee unless we win.
Arc Flash Injury FAQ
- What is the difference between an arc flash and an electrocution?
-
In an electrocution, current passes through the body, and the damage follows that path internally, including cardiac and deep tissue injury. In an arc flash, a fault jumps across an air gap between conductors, producing extreme radiant heat, molten metal, and a pressure wave. A worker can suffer severe burns without ever contacting anything energized. The distinction matters legally because it changes which safety failure caused the harm and which evidence proves it.
- Which New York Industrial Code section applies to electrical injuries?
-
12 NYCRR 23-1.13, which covers electrical hazards in construction, demolition, and excavation. It requires that all power lines near a site be considered energized until assurance is given otherwise, that the employer determine voltage levels before work begins, that contact risk be ascertained by inquiry, observation, or instruments, that workers not be permitted near circuits they may contact unless those circuits are de-energized and grounded or effectively guarded, and that written notice go to the utility at least five working days before work within ten feet of a live overhead line.
- The panel was supposed to be locked out. Does that help or hurt my case?
-
It generally helps a great deal. A failed lockout means somebody was responsible for verifying the circuit was dead and either did not do it or did it wrong, and the Industrial Code requires open switches to be guarded against inadvertent closing while workers are exposed. Lockout tag logs, switching orders, and the identity of the person who gave the clearance are all discoverable. The fact that a procedure existed and was not followed is usually stronger evidence than the absence of any procedure at all.
- Can I sue the manufacturer of the equipment that failed?
-
Sometimes, and it is worth evaluating in every serious arc flash case. Switchgear and breakers are designed to clear a fault within a specified time, and equipment that failed to do so, or that lacked arc-resistant features or adequate labeling, can support a product liability claim alongside the Labor Law claims against the owner and contractors. This is one of the strongest reasons to preserve the failed equipment before it is scrapped or returned to the manufacturer.
- I was not wearing arc-rated clothing. Does that reduce my recovery?
-
It depends on which claim carries the case. Comparative negligence is not a defense to a Labor Law § 240(1) claim, though most arc flash injuries are not elevation-related and so run under § 241(6) and common law negligence, where comparative fault does apply. Even then, New York uses pure comparative negligence outside motor vehicle cases, so a share of fault reduces the recovery rather than barring it. The more useful question is usually who was responsible for supplying and requiring arc-rated protective equipment, because that duty rarely sat with the injured worker.
- How long do I have to bring an electrical injury claim in New York?
-
Three years from the date of the accident under CPLR § 214 for claims against private owners and contractors, and two years from the date of death for a wrongful death claim. If the work was on public property, or involved a public authority, a notice of claim may be required within 90 days with suit within one year and 90 days. Utility-owned facilities add their own considerations. Because so much New York electrical work touches public infrastructure, that question should be resolved at the outset.
Burned in an Arc Flash? The Gear That Failed Gets Replaced Fast.
Buildings need power restored. The switchgear that put you in a burn unit is often gone within the week.
Electricians deserve circuits that were actually verified dead, equipment that was maintained, protective clothing rated for the hazard, and a foreman who sent the utility notice the code requires. The trial lawyers at Lawsuit Legal send preservation demands the same week, pull the lockout and notification records, and evaluate the equipment manufacturer alongside the owner and the contractors.
We help electricians, apprentices, maintenance workers, and families of workers killed by electrical faults, with the legal help they need to hold every responsible party to the standards already written down. Call (888) 713-6653 or contact us online for a free review of your arc flash injury claim.
Free Case Evaluation
FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW