Telemedicine False Claims: Modern Healthcare Fraud
A new and effective way for doctors and patients to communicate is through telehealth and telemedicine. Sometimes both are referred to as eHealth.
Have Questions?
Let's See If You Have a Case...
Doctors now have the ability to provide care without physically seeing the patient. This service is available for patients living in rural areas farther away from a certified medical care facility.
Telemedicine and some telehealth provided medical services can be covered by Medicare, Tricare and Medicaid.
Medical clinics, Doctors and Pharmaceutical companies should be aware of this popular new and innovative option for patients.
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reported in November 2017 that “Medicaid programs are seeing a significant increase in claims for these services and expect the trend to continue.” [1]
The increase prompted the OIG to update the rules and regulations governing reimbursement of Medicare, Tricare and Medicaid eHealth claims.
The modernized regulations help guide Doctors and Medical care facilities with the proper use of covered services. Knowingly taking advantage of these services using false claims is considered fraud.
Fighting Telecare False Claims Fraud
As Federal and State governments refine reimbursement for online medical care policies some unscrupulous medical and pharmaceutical providers are taking advantage of the system.
Telecare Violations: Turn Them In
"Whistleblowers are critical to help root out those who exploit government programs."
Medical professionals know that making false Medicare or Medicaid claims for in-person is considered fraud. The same applied for telemedicine and telehealth.
Medicare Fraud is covered under the False Claim Act.
Federal and State Governments use the False Claims Act to empower those who have knowledge of wrongdoing and report them.
You can also report Medicare Fraud anonymously.
Telemedicine uses the same Medicare claim guidelines that apply to in-person care with additional rules for covered services.
Before reporting or bringing a case for telemedicine fraud it is important to understand the difference between telemedicine and telehealth.

What are Telehealth and Telemedicine?
Telehealth and telemedicine are considered two different types of online healthcare.
Both utilize electronic means to deliver medical services, treatments or prescriptions. This allows them to be defined as eHealth or telecare service.
The electronic means for clinical services include:
- Doctor/Patient Videoconferencing
- Internet Communication
- Store-and-forward Technologies
- Streaming Media
- Wireless Communications
- Telemonitoring Service
- Email, Fax, Text Communication
- Prescription of Drugs
According to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health information Technology (ONC) - “telehealth as the use of electronic information and telecommunications technologies to support and promote long-distance clinical health care, patient and professional health-related education, public health and health administration.” [2]
This general description is helpful, but specifically defining the difference between telemedicine and telehealth services is important for understanding what is covered by Medicare Part B, Medicaid or Tricare.
Telehealth vs. Telemedicine
Telemedicine
Telemedicine is a more specific term used to define telecommunication healthcare services and covers only remote clinical services.
Telemedicine the the real time, two-way interactive communication between the patient and the Doctor at an approved distant site.
In layman’s terms Telemedicine is like Facetime with a patient and Telehealth is all other communication with a patient.
Telemedicine treatments are live, interactive and include clinical services like:
- Remote Office/Practitioner Visits
- Patient consultation
- Clinical Services
- Examinations
Beside live electronic video interaction two key additional elements must be exist in order for services to be defined as telemedicine: Distant or Hub Site and Originating or Spoke Site.
- Distant or Hub site is the location where the physician or a licensed practitioner delivering the service is located at the time the clinical service was telecommunicated.
- Origination site is the location where the Medicaid or Medicare patient is at the time when the remote healthcare service is provided. Qualified telepresenters could be required to administer the clinical services.
These remote eServices are extremely helpful for patients that live far away from the location where the Doctor they need is located.
Unfortunately, these new modern services allow for a few unscrupulous medical providers to take advantage of government insurance programs.
Medicare telemedicine reimbursements include fraudulent claims using false remote diagnosis, phantom patients, fake telemedicine appointments and insurance reimbursement for non-essential drugs and fictitious treatments.
Telemedicine fraud is easier to spot because of its narrower definition. Telehealth on the other hand has recently begun to receive Medicaid reimbursement and has opened the door to additional types of false claims.
Telehealth
Telehealth is the use of telecommunications and information technology for medical services. These services include health assessments, diagnosis, intervention, consultations, supervision and information access longer distances.
The technologies used for telehealth include:
- Telephones
- Facsimile Machines
- Remote patient monitoring devices
- Asynchronous Communication - “Store and Forward”
Whistleblowers will file an action (lawsuit) against the party responsible for the fraud. This copy of the action needs to be officially submitted to the Office of the Inspector general and the U.S. Attorney.
These forms of communication are used to transmit patient information for monitoring and diagnosis.
An important aspect of telehealth is Asynchronous communication. This from of electronic remote health service is commonly mistaken for or used in fraud as telemedicine.
Asynchronous communication is the transmission of medical data with the use of a camera or recording device that saves (stores) images and sends (forwards) using telecommunications.
While a live recording has taken place the live, interactive communication with the Doctor or clinic has not. Therefore asynchronous communication is not considered telemedicine.
Telehealth services like these are not considered telemedicine. Asynchronous communication and similar telehealth forms of medicine may still be utilized. Some applications may be covered under the Medicaid broad umbrella policy of telehealth. The telehealth space of covered services will continue to evolve and expand. Medical professionals should consult Medicare or Medicaid for currently approved services to avoid mistakes. Fraud only occurs when you are knowingly violating the rules.
This expanded broad coverage for telehealth services is were fraudulent medical care facilities, nursing homes, pharmaceutical companies and medical clinics can take advantage.
Telemedicine Fraud: New Frontline for Whistleblower Attorneys
Telemedicine and Telehealth are new technologies. Newer advancements in medical treatments make life easier for patients but create a potential for abuse.
However, these innovations in healthcare are more difficult to regulate. As Medicare and other healthcare programs cover these innovative services new fraud schemes follow along.
The Department of Justice, the US Attorney General's Office and State Attorneys need help identifying complex and new illegal schemes.
Medical professionals should consult with a qualified Qui Tam Attorney to help bring cases if they believe a pattern of fraudulent action is in fact occurring.
"Those who blow the whistle on fraud are the first line of defense in stopping abuse of government programs..."
In October 2018 four people and seven companies were indicted in a $1 Billion dollar telemedicine fraud scheme. The scheme involved the defendants setting-up a complex telemedicine process.
HealthRight, LLC, using other complicit pharmacies, fraudulently requested insurance coverage and prescriptions from people all over the country according to the indictment.
The people (legal term: Relators in a qui tam suit) who report fraud may be eligible to receive a reward and a portion of the recovered sum.
Doctors and clinics were approving drugs without even knowing the defendants where massively marking-up the prices and billing private insurance carriers.
While the private insurance carriers are not covered directly by the FCA, in many cases there is overlap with Medicare and Medicaid. This would allow for broader application of the False Claims Act.
This example is just the beginning of the new fight that awaits Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare in the future.
These government programs are typically slower to react and enforce change.
The government will rely on the public and medical professional to help.
Rewards for Help against Telehealth Fraud
Individuals with knowledge of medical fraud can help and should seek counsel from a qualified Qui Tam lawyer.
These whistleblower attorneys are the best source for people considering bringing a case against illicit medical companies or Doctors who will need someone protecting their interests throughout the proceedings.

An expert in False Claims Act lawsuits will know exactly what constitutes a violation and be able to help unravel whether you truly do have a case.
Healthcare fraud is a specialized skillset and not all lawyers will have the background in whistleblower law investigations to be able to unravel the truth.
Whistleblowers receive significant rewards for a successful qui-tam case. These rewards under the qui tam provision may entitle those who blow the whistle up from 15%-30% of the recovered sum.
This means in a cases similar to the HealthRight, LLC case. If $1 billion is recovered by the government the whistleblower could receive a minimum of $150 million dollars in reward.
Visit here for more information about potential Whistleblower rewards.
If you or someone you know suspects or has direct knowledge of telehealth fraud seeking proper legal counsel is important to help you navigate the process.
The False Claims Act has whistleblower protection laws. These laws make it a crime for those people or companies under suspicion of fraud to intimidate, retaliate or attempt to influence individuals who are engaged in a whistleblower case.
To receive this protection, and the potential rewards for exposing fraudulent telehealth or telemedicine acts, get your free consultation today.
Do I Have a Case?
Let's See If You Have a Case...
External Resources
Whistleblower News
-
$11 Million Sarbanes-Oxley Retaliation Jury Award
- 2017, CA (Wadler v. Bio-Rad 15-cv-02356-JCS) -
$1.9 Million in Damages to SOX Whistleblower
- 2016 (Becker v. Community Health Systems Inc.) -
$2.7M Sarbox Whistleblower Front Pay Award
- 2016, (Perez vs. Progenics Pharmaceutical)