Whistleblower Retaliation Cases: Employee Guide
Have Questions?
Let's See If You Have a Case...
Individuals who report employer violations of laws and regulations can be subject to retaliation.
This whistleblower retaliation can take many forms and can be applied to both current and former employees that blew the whistle on abuse.
Regardless of the whistleblowing case outcomes, employees who relate information that leads to a case are often punished by their employer.
Whistleblowers need to understand what behavior is legally considered employer retaliation and how to prove it.
The whistleblower protection laws shield employees who come forward and report wrongdoing.
This, however, does not prevent employers from taking action in violation of the law.
The first thing to know is that whistleblowing and retaliation claims are two separate things.
Blowing the whistle is a legally protected act and affords the employee protections under federal law.
Any adverse actions taken in retaliation by an employer is treated as a separate violation and potential case.
What is considered whistleblower retaliation?
Any adverse action taken by a current or former employer to punish an employee for blowing the whistle. In the workplace it can include job opportunity loss, demotions, termination of employment, or reassignments.
Former employers who attempt to prevent future employment opportunities or industry blackball, or engage in post-employment interference by providing negative or false information to prospective employers for engaging in legally protected activity is considered retaliation.
According to the EEOC a retaliation claim consists of the following three elements:
1. Employees participation in a protected action.
2. An adverse action taken against the employee.
3. A causal connection must exist between the protected activity and adverse action.
Quick Navigation
Table of Contents:
[show]
- Whistleblower Retaliation: Employee Guide
- What is considered whistleblower retaliation?
- Whistleblowing or Retaliation Claim: What’s the Difference?
- Anti-Retaliation Laws: Why They Exist
- Common Employer Retaliation Tactics
- Fact Patterns of Workplace Retaliation
- Fact Patterns of Post-Employment Retaliation
- Proving Retaliation Claims: Causation, Motive, Direct & Subtle Evidence
- The Temporal Proximity of Adverse Action
- Fighting Back After Retaliation
- References

Whistleblowing or Retaliation Claim: What’s the Difference?
Often times these two cases are discussed together since retaliation is so common in a whistleblower claim.
After all, when an employer is already breaking law it is an easy step for them to start violating employee retaliation regulations.
In a qui tam case the identity of the whistleblower is protected and sealed under court order. It is only revealed once the investigation is complete and legal action is taken.
At this point whistleblower cases are focused on the specific laws the company violated. The company will be defending itself against claims that laws were broken.
Retaliation claims are separate from the qui tam action. Companies that retaliate against an employee are subject to additional litigation outside the scope of their other violations.
A better understanding can be found in this example:
An employee reports a False Claims Act violation of Medicare fraud by their employer.
When the Medicare fraud case is filed against the company the anonymous whistleblower’s identity is ultimately revealed.
A couple months later the employer terminates the employee for what they say is downsizing. This is actually retaliation opening the company to further liability. It needs to be proven, but the proximity to the legally protected whistleblowing case provides strong evidence in support.
The individual is free to seek civil redress with a retaliation lawsuit. If action is taken the company now has two cases pending against them. One for violation of the False Claims Act and one for violation of Anti-Retaliation employment laws.

Anti-Retaliation Laws: Why They Exist
Federal and State governments need the help of whistleblowers. Without them many violations and dangers to the public go unreported until it is too late.
This is the reason why whistleblower protection and anti-retaliation laws are so powerful.
The Government knows that reporting fraud can be pervasive. Losing your livelihood and employment can have drastic effects on your life, but they don’t want that keep people from reporting. So they protect them.
That is why it is against the law to punish an employee for engaging in a legally protected activity.
A legally protected activity, under the False Claims Act, is the reporting an employer who commits fraud against the government.
Whether the fraud is proven or not does not matter. If the employee acted in good faith retaliation against them is illegal.
However, the fact that it is illegal does not stop employers, institutions or companies from using punishing tactics and other forms of retaliation.
"People are often caught by surprise ― feeling betrayed over their treatment by the company they dedicated so much of their life to..."
List of Commonly Reported Retaliation Tactics
Employers retaliate because they are scared, ashamed or angry.
That is what whistleblowers need to remember - emotion often overrides better judgement.
They have broken the law and resent those who demonstrated the ability to do the right thing and get rewarded.
Because of this former and current employers often use a number of unscrupulous tactics when retaliating against employees in an attempt to hide their motive.
List of Whistleblower Retaliation Tactics in Workplace:
- Reprimanding or terminating an employee for their actions - The most common form of whistleblower retaliation.
- Lowering employee evaluations that should be higher - You have always performed your job up to and above company standards with good performance reviews. After they discover you reported fraud your evaluations turn negative with unreasonable black marks.
- Transferring an employee to another location or less desirable position: demotion - Employers know you do not like a certain position in the company. They purposely transfer you there to increase the chances you quit
- Verbal or physical abuse - Outright violation. Verbal abuse is more common than physical abuse in the workplace. Supervisors degrade you as a “rat” or say “don’t say anything around them!”
- Threatening an employee - Very common tactic. Employers make it seem like they were unaware of violations and it is your fault; or that you are as culpable as them in the fraud. They threaten that you will go down with them or that they will report you to the authorities.
- Negatively affecting an employee’s family - Canceling a contract with someone who is related to the whistleblower.
- Making work life more difficult - Changing an employee's schedule to purposely create conflicts in their personal life.
- Increased scrutiny of job performance - All of a sudden all your work in being scrutinized for poor performance without proper cause. Employers will say this is the way things have to be now that you reported us.
List of Post-Employment Retaliation Fact Patterns:
- Spreading of false rumors - Backhanded way of pushing employees out. By spreading lies about you other coworkers make your life more difficult. The employer hopes this causes you to quit.
- Blackballing - Similar to spreading false rumors but worse. Former employers tell other companies and similar businesses you can’t be trusted and should not be hired to prevent new employment.
These actions are considered employer retaliation and a violation of the whistleblower protection laws. However, in a retaliation case these claims need to be proven.
"Companies that take a negative employment action against employees who exercised a legally protected action should be held accountable..."
Proving Retaliation Claims: Causation
While it may seem obvious to most people that a whistleblower was retaliated against for reporting violations, it must be proven.
To prove an employer broke the rules you must show causation.
This means you need to demonstrate a direct link between the reporting of wrongdoing and the adverse action against them.
In a majority of whistleblower retaliation cases the adverse action is a wrongful termination.
Needle in a Haystack Firings
In order to fire a whistleblower and hide their true purpose, it's not unheard of for a company to lay off groups of workers in order to include and eliminate the whistleblower. A good employment attorney will be wise to this tactic and be able to prove the correlation.
Companies will employ a number of “legitimate” reasons (claiming they have nothing to do with the employee’s actions) for firing a whistleblower.
- Regular layoffs due to economic reasons
- Things are just not working out
- This job is not a good fit
- Employee was guilty of misconduct
Employees need to remember this is not the end, but the beginning. When you suspect the employer retaliated against you consult with your attorney.
They will review the facts and help investigate for supporting evidence.
Your lawyer will be able to identify what evidence supports your claim.
In retaliation cases the more evidence the better. Combining these forms of workplace retaliation evidence helps to prove and win your case.
Retaliatory Motive Evidence
Retaliatory Motive Evidence This is evidence related to a direct motive for retaliating against an employee for their whistleblower activity.
Direct Evidence Example
Direct Evidence included documentation such as email communication. “Jane keeps asking about our Medicaid billing practices. We might need to move her to another location (or something else) before she causes a problem.”
This is direct evidence and it rarely exists or is found with careful employers and HR teams. Especially if an attorney has not secured discovery in your case.
More subtle forms of evidence are more common.
Subtle Evidence Example
Subtle evidence would include an email stating, “Jane’s questioning has made lot more work for us in the billing department. It’s costly but I recommend we hire someone else to help.”
This is not direct evidence but it is circumstantial and it helps show a pattern or the possibility that a hostile work environment exists in the workplace.
Evidence has “weight” and the more legitimate evidence you have the stronger your case.
This physical evidence is strong, but the most common is the timing of retaliation known as the temporal proximity.
Employers have even been known to lay-off multiple employees that had nothing to do with the whistleblower just to try and cover their actions.
Here are some strategies for Whistleblower employees that remain at the same job:
- Keep track of any changes to your job - DOCUMENT EVERYTHING
- Notify Human Resources of all your concerns
- Ask your employer for a copy of all your employee records
- Find a co-worker you can trust to help you identify changes
- Follow company policies exactly
- Don’t buy into a state of “everything is fine”
- Acquire the most recent copy of the Employee Handbook
The last piece of evidence used to prove a retaliation case is when a company deviates from their policies.
Deviation of Policies
Additional Evidence of Retaliatory Action - Often overlooked by employers is when they divert from their stated policies to take action after an employee reports them.
Policy deviations to retaliate include circumstances where a company's policy is three similar write-up warnings before termination. The company breaks its own rules and fires an employee without proper warnings in violation of their standard policy.

The Temporal Proximity of an Adverse Action
Two important definitions:
- Temporal Proximity - The shorter the time between your whistleblowing and an employer’s adverse action the better. Always a good piece of circumstantial evidence to support whistleblower retaliation claims. This shows a higher chance of causation between the two events.
How Temporal Proximity works
A period of approximately 30 days is considered very close in most courts. If termination or retaliation tactics are in close enough proximity, it alone is sufficient to prove causation.
Temporal Proximity Example
Temporal proximity is illustrated when Jane’s boss terminates her three weeks after it is revealed she reported a pattern of hospital upcoding fraud (a False Claims Act violation). Her boss states, “this has nothing to do with your whistleblowing. You remember we had all those financial issues six months ago and this is the result.”
Fighting Back After Retaliation
Overcoming a Violation of Your Rights Together
Once wrongdoing is reported the time you have to document and gather evidence varies.
In qui tam cases you may have months after reporting since you remain anonymous until the court filings.
Waste no time in finding and reviewing your case details with proper legal representation.
Remember, retaliation cases are separate from the illegal violations you initially reported.
An experienced whistleblower attorney will advise you on the proper evidence you need to gather while you have time and access.
You can't stop an angry employer from taking retaliatory action. But when you can prove they do violate your rights and the the law it opens them up to further liability and another potential lawsuit.
Do I Have a Case?
Let's See If You Have a Case...
External Resources
Lawsuit Information
-
$11 Million Sarbanes-Oxley Retaliation Jury Award
- 2017, CA (Wadler v. Bio-Rad 15-cv-02356-JCS) -
$1.9 Million in Damages to SOX Whistleblower
- 2016 (Becker v. Community Health Systems Inc.) -
$2.7M Sarbox Whistleblower Front Pay Award
- 2016, (Perez vs. Progenics Pharmaceutical)