Wrongful Death vs. Criminal Case: What's the Difference?

Wrongful Death vs. Criminal Case

A wrongful death lawsuit and a criminal case are two separate proceedings, and a family can have both.

The criminal case is brought by the government to punish the wrongdoer, and it can end in prison.

The wrongful death case is brought by the family to recover compensation, and it ends in money damages.

The burden of proof is different and lower in the civil case, which is why a family can win a wrongful death lawsuit even when there is no criminal conviction.

The criminal case answers to the state. The civil case answers to you.

Together, they offer two separate paths to accountability for the same loss.

Call (888) 713-6653 for a free, confidential review of a wrongful death case, or use the form.

How the Civil and Criminal Cases Differ

The two cases can arise from the same death, but they are built for entirely different purposes and answer to different people.

• Who brings it. A prosecutor, on behalf of the state, brings the criminal case. The family, on its own behalf, brings the wrongful death lawsuit.
• The goal. The criminal case seeks to punish and deter through conviction. The civil case seeks to compensate the family for its loss.
• The outcome. A criminal case can end in prison, probation, or fines paid to the state. A civil case ends in money damages paid to the family.
• Who controls it. The prosecutor decides whether to charge and how to proceed in the criminal case, and the family has little say. The family controls the civil case.

The civil case is where the family is made whole, and it reaches defendants the criminal court never touches. A drunk driver can go to prison, but it is the wrongful death claim that reaches the bar that overserved him and the employer whose truck he drove.

This is why a criminal case, even a successful one, rarely meets a family's needs on its own. Restitution in a criminal case is limited and often goes unpaid, while the civil case is built to recover the full loss.

The Burden of Proof Is Different, and Lower

The single most important practical difference is the standard of proof, and it works in the family's favor.

To convict in a criminal case, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard in the law. To win a wrongful death case, the family must prove its claim by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely than not that the defendant caused the death. That is a far lower bar.

The most famous illustration is a case where a defendant is acquitted of a killing in criminal court, then found liable for the same death in a civil wrongful death suit. There is no contradiction. The criminal jury was not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, while the civil jury found it more likely than not. Different standards, different results, both correct under the law.

You Can Win the Civil Case Without a Conviction

Because the civil standard is lower, a wrongful death claim does not depend on the criminal case. The family can win even when:

• No one is charged. A prosecutor may decline to bring charges for reasons that have nothing to do with civil liability.
• The defendant is acquitted. An acquittal means the criminal standard was not met, not that the defendant is free of civil responsibility.
• The conduct was not a crime at all. Most wrongful deaths come from negligence, a car crash, a medical error, an unsafe property, which is rarely criminal but is fully actionable in a civil claim.

When a criminal conviction does happen, it can help the civil case, sometimes establishing facts the civil defendant cannot relitigate. But the family never needs to wait for, or depend on, the criminal system to pursue its own claim.

How the Two Cases Interact

When both a criminal case and a wrongful death claim exist, they run on parallel tracks, and the timing has to be managed.

An ongoing criminal case can affect the civil one. Evidence gathered by police and prosecutors can later support the civil claim, and a conviction can carry over. At the same time, a defendant facing criminal charges may invoke the Fifth Amendment in the civil case, and courts sometimes pause civil discovery until the criminal matter resolves. None of this bars the civil claim; it simply means an experienced lawyer coordinates the timing so the family's case is protected.

What matters most is that the family does not assume the criminal case will make them whole. It will not. Pursuing the civil claim is the only path to full compensation, covered alongside the survival claim in our guide to wrongful death versus survival action.