Bad Faith Insurance Claims in Florida

Free Case Evaluation


FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW

    When the Insurance Company Itself Becomes the Defendant

    Insurers owe duties in how they handle claims, and Florida law makes them answer for breaking them.

    An insurer that could have settled within the policy limits and wrongly refused can end up owing the whole judgment, far past what the policy ever promised.

    That is bad faith, and it is the one claim insurers genuinely fear.

    Florida bad faith insurance claim

    The 2023 tort reform rewrote these rules in the insurers' favor, and a claim built on the old playbook now fails.

    Mere negligence is no longer enough, tender deadlines create safe harbors, and claimants now carry duties of their own.

    Here is how a Florida bad faith case works after HB 837, and why the groundwork starts in the injury claim itself.


    At-a-Glance: Florida Bad Faith After HB 837

    • Bad faith exposes insurers to damages above the policy limits
    • Mere negligence by the insurer is no longer enough to prove it
    • Insurer safe harbor: tendering limits within 90 days of notice bars the claim
    • A 60-day civil remedy notice and cure period comes before most suits
    • Claimants now owe their own duty of good faith in the claim process
    Florida insurance bad faith lawsuit


    What Counts as Bad Faith in Florida, and What No Longer Does

    "The policy limit is what the insurer promised. Bad faith is how the promise gets enforced when they gamble with someone else's ruin."

    The core of bad faith is an insurer putting its own money ahead of its duties: refusing a reasonable chance to settle within limits, dragging out a claim it knows it owes, lowballing with information it knows is false, or failing to defend its insured properly.

    HB 837 raised the bar for proving it. Under the amended § 624.155, mere negligence alone is insufficient to constitute bad faith.[1] A sloppy adjuster or a slow file no longer makes the case. The conduct has to rise beyond carelessness, to a knowing or reckless disregard of the insurer's obligations, proven through the claim file, the correspondence, and the timeline.

    The reform also armed insurers with a defense aimed at claimants: the injured person and their lawyer now owe a duty of good faith in furnishing information, making demands, setting deadlines, and attempting settlement. A demand designed to be impossible, a deadline built for failure, or withheld records can reduce the bad faith damages a jury awards. The set-up game is dead. What survives is the honest, documented, reasonable demand that the insurer still refuses.

    The Two Clocks: The 90-Day Safe Harbor and the 60-Day Cure Notice

    Two deadlines now shape every potential bad faith case, one for each side.

    The insurer's 90-day safe harbor. An insurer that tenders the lesser of the policy limits or the amount demanded within 90 days of receiving actual notice of the claim, with enough evidence to evaluate it, cannot be sued for bad faith on that claim. The tender window rewards early, complete documentation from the victim's side: the sooner the insurer has everything it needs, the sooner its 90 days start running against a real decision.

    The claimant's 60-day cure notice. Before most statutory bad faith suits, a civil remedy notice must be filed with the state and served on the insurer, spelling out the violation. The insurer then has 60 days to cure by paying the damages or correcting the violation. A cured violation ends the claim, and a defective notice can end it too, which is why the notice is drafted like a pleading, not a form.

    Between the two clocks sits the practical lesson: bad faith cases are built during the underlying injury claim, in the demand package, the deadlines, and the paper trail, months before anyone files anything.


    excess judgment bad faith Florida

    Why Bad Faith Matters: Money Above the Policy Limits

    Bad faith is the exception to the hardest rule in injury law: that recovery stops at the policy limits.

    When a jury returns a verdict above the limits after the insurer wrongly refused to settle, a successful bad faith claim makes the insurer pay the excess judgment, the whole verdict, not the policy cap its insured bought. Recoverable damages run to the foreseeable consequences of the violation, plus court costs and attorney fees. Punitive damages are possible where the misconduct reflects a general business practice done willfully or with reckless disregard.

    In a state where drivers legally carry no bodily injury coverage at all, and minimum policies are thin, that leverage matters most in serious cases. It polices the gap between what insurers owe and what they hope to pay, and every adjuster who handles a claim professionally is responding to the existence of this remedy.


    Third-Party and First-Party: The Two Shapes of the Case

    Third-party bad faith is the classic shape. The at-fault driver's insurer refuses a within-limits settlement of your claim, the case goes to verdict above the limits, and the insured driver is left personally exposed. The bad faith claim then pursues the insurer for the excess, often through an assignment of the insured's rights. The insurer gambled with its own customer's finances and lost.

    First-party bad faith runs against your own carrier, most often in uninsured motorist claims, where Florida's coverage landscape sends so many serious cases. A UM insurer that stonewalls, underpays, or games its own claim process faces the same statutory remedy. Given that roughly one in five Florida drivers carries no insurance, the UM claim mishandled in bad faith is a recurring story, and our page on uninsured driver claims in Florida explains how those claims are supposed to work.

    Either shape begins the same way: an underlying claim handled with documented professionalism on the victim's side, so the insurer's conduct stands alone in the file. That is not luck. It is how our Florida car accident lawyers run every serious claim from day one.

     


    Florida Bad Faith Insurance FAQ

    What is insurance bad faith in Florida?

    An insurer's knowing or reckless breach of its claim-handling duties: refusing to settle within policy limits when it could and should have, misrepresenting facts or coverage, or failing to act fairly and honestly toward its insured. Since HB 837, mere negligence alone is not enough; the conduct must go beyond carelessness. The remedy is powerful: an insurer found in bad faith can owe the full judgment, including everything above the policy limits.

    Can I recover more than the policy limits in Florida?

    Through a bad faith claim, yes. If the insurer wrongly refused a reasonable within-limits settlement and a verdict later exceeds the limits, the bad faith action makes the insurer pay the excess judgment, plus costs and attorney fees, and in general-business-practice cases, potentially punitive damages. It is the main path past the limits in Florida, and it only exists when the underlying claim was handled in a way that documents the insurer's refusal.

    What is the 90-day rule in Florida bad faith cases?

    A safe harbor for insurers, created by HB 837. An insurer that tenders the lesser of the policy limits or the amount demanded within 90 days of receiving actual notice of the claim, with sufficient supporting evidence, cannot be sued for bad faith on that claim. Missing the window is not itself bad faith, and evidence of the tender is inadmissible later. Practically, the rule means claims should be documented fully and presented early, so the insurer's decision clock runs against complete information.

    Do I have to send a notice before suing an insurer for bad faith?

    For statutory bad faith claims, yes. A civil remedy notice specifying the violation, the facts, and the policy language must be filed with the state and served on the insurer, which then has 60 days to cure by paying or correcting the violation. A cure ends the claim; a defective notice can too. The notice is a technical document with case-ending consequences, and it should be drafted by counsel who intends to try the case behind it.

    Is an Insurer Playing Games With Your Claim?

    Delay, denial, and lowball offers are tactics. Sometimes they are also violations.

    Injury victims deserve insurers that evaluate claims honestly, pay what the coverage promises, and answer when they gamble with other people's lives. The trial lawyers at Lawsuit Legal build the underlying claim so that if the insurer chooses bad faith, the file already proves it.

    We help crash victims facing stonewalled claims, policyholders fighting their own UM carriers, and families left holding excess verdicts, throughout Florida. Call (888) 713-6653 for a free case review.

     

     

     

     

     

    Free Case Evaluation


    FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW
    TO REQUEST YOUR CASE REVIEW

      External Resources
      Legal Representation

      "Speak with our Florida injury attorneys for a free, confidential review of your potential claim. Past results vary based on the unique facts of each case."

      Find out more >>